<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DLKeur: To Infinity &#38; Beyond, Forever &#187; politics, culture, society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/category/opinions-on-politics-culture-society/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog</link>
	<description>artist, webmaster and website designer, author/novelist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:16:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dearth</title>
		<link>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/07/20/dearth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/07/20/dearth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dlkeur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics, culture, society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dearth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/?p=458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had to laugh this morning.  Today&#8217;s Word of the Day from Dictionary.com is &#8220;dearth.&#8221;  It means scarcity, lack&#8230;an inadequate supply. Dearth: It applies to the economies of the world, including the U.S. and it&#8217;s job market.  It applies to U.S. politics and the lack of common ground, common cause, and common sense.  It applies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to laugh this morning.  Today&#8217;s Word of the Day from Dictionary.com is &#8220;dearth.&#8221;  It means scarcity, lack&#8230;an inadequate supply.</p>
<p>Dearth: It applies to the economies of the world, including the U.S. and it&#8217;s job market.  It applies to U.S. politics and the lack of common ground, common cause, and common sense.  It applies to our species&#8217; levels of tolerance&#8211;the lack thereof these days&#8211;from Western societies to Middle Eastern societies to Far Eastern societies.  It applies to human-to-human and human-to-other kindness&#8211;severely lacking now in this our 21st century.  In short, the word &#8220;dearth&#8221; applies to us as our socio-political reality.</p>
<p>Prior to 9/11/2001, that infamous day when the skies of New York City darkened with the World Trade Center disaster, and despite the stolen election of the U.S. presidency by the pretender G. W. Bush, there was hope; there was, in fact, a growing sense of peace, prosperity, and, yes, a kinder, gentler America&#8230;which would, in turn, one trusted, lead in time to a kinder, gentler, less selfish world.</p>
<p>That all changed in the moment whoever was responsible for the 9/11 attack on America instigated their act (&#8230;and I still suspect those who had to most to gain&#8211;the strongest motive).  It stirred a sleeping dragon, a nest of hornets. America reacted to 9/11 with vicious determination, its people hurt and angry, the flames of their sorrow-born rage provoked and encouraged by a political agenda that desired nothing more than to feed the lucre of power and resources to itself via its industrial war machine, greasing greedy wheels with human blood.</p>
<p>Gone in that moment were all the gains toward a more peaceful, benevolent world&#8211;kindness, tolerance, economic prosperity, the hope of a better future for all of us. Instead, hate, intolerance, and fear dominated our national psyche, the result of which pitched us and the world to the brink of political and economic fascism&#8211;the dearth of billions for the enrichment of the few.</p>
<p>No longer do the voices of benevolence and kindness, of civility and tolerance, hold forth within the public ear. Instead, schisms between ideologies, theologies, and cultures, are cultivated and encouraged by gleeful profiteers, collapsing civility, solvency, and plenty, and replacing them with dearth&#8211;dearth for the poor and for the middle class, dearth for the general human populations, dearth that leads to further degradation of the world environment.</p>
<p>Hatred, fear and rage has replaced common sense and tolerance, a hatred and fear engineered using the power of influence to seed its seepingly insidious corruption into a vulnerable public mind that fails to grasp the agenda of the elite socio-political masterminds behind it who are bent on owning and controlling everything to the benefit of themselves&#8211;the mighty few&#8211;to the detriment and dearth of everyone and every thing else.</p>
<p>Dearth, a word to think on.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/07/20/dearth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Secret Republican Credo</title>
		<link>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/06/18/the-secret-republican-credo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/06/18/the-secret-republican-credo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dlkeur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics, culture, society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Secret Republican Credo: We the mega-corporations of the world do ordain and establish our goal to abrograte the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights in order to ensure our world domination of all lands, peoples and resources to the enrichment of ourselves and our bank accounts utilizing the Tea Party and the Republican Party [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Secret Republican Credo: We the mega-corporations of the world do ordain and establish our goal to abrograte the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights in order to ensure our world domination of all lands, peoples and resources to the enrichment of ourselves and our bank accounts utilizing the Tea Party and the Republican Party base of misguided religious fanatics, white trash, and human lemmings. Those who oppose us will be exterminated by deprivation; those who support us will be rewarded with enslavement and life termination when we determine they no longer sufficiently contribute to our bottom line or at age 45, whichever comes first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/06/18/the-secret-republican-credo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fairness</title>
		<link>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/06/18/fairness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/06/18/fairness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dlkeur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics, culture, society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injustice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a saying that &#8220;life isn&#8217;t fair.&#8221; Okay, in a Darwinian sense, that&#8217;s very true. It&#8217;s true because of chance and circumstance. However, humans try very hard to make things fairer&#8230;for themselves&#8230;and vehemently object to being treated unfairly by others. This objection to unfairness brought those. such as the Calvinites, who were persecuted for their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a saying that &#8220;life isn&#8217;t fair.&#8221; Okay, in a Darwinian sense, that&#8217;s very true. It&#8217;s true because of chance and circumstance. However, humans try very hard to make things fairer&#8230;for themselves&#8230;and vehemently object to being treated unfairly by others. This objection to unfairness brought those. such as the Calvinites, who were persecuted for their beliefs in Europe and Britain to the &#8220;New World&#8221; in search of religious freedom for themselves&#8230;and went on to institute the very same, and, in some cases, more violent, persecutions against others who did not embrace their religious doctrine. Wanting fairness for themselves, they were willing to deny fairness to others. Don&#8217;t you find that hypocritical? I do (though, I don&#8217;t find it surprising.)</p>
<p>In Israel, the Jews, victims of genocidal persecution, in turn now persecute the Palestinians, including invidious methods of genocide&#8211; denying water, livelihood, and shelter. The Jews wanted fairness, but refuse to, themselves, be fair.</p>
<p>In the U.S. today, I see a great deal of this kind of hypocrisy embraced&#8211;the &#8220;I&#8217;ve got mine, and I&#8217;ll deny you yours&#8221; mentality. I find this level of unfairness based in intolerance unacceptable, yet the socio-political direction most evident through the media, in the workplace, and in interaction between people online and off demonstrates to me that we, having been purposely factionalized by power brokers playing us for pawns for their own agenda, are evermore embracing unfairness, intolerance, and injustice. I think we really need to pull ourselves up and take a keen look at who we are becoming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/06/18/fairness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, I Won&#8217;t. Don&#8217;t Expect It.</title>
		<link>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/06/06/no-i-wont-dont-expect-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/06/06/no-i-wont-dont-expect-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dlkeur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics, culture, society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the personal side]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I belong to a number of organizations which focus on varied causes, from preserving our wildlife and wilderness and stopping starvation, deprivation, and/or cruelty to preserving our Constitution and Bill of Rights.  I sign petitions, write my congressional representatives and senators, and generally participate in the socio-political process, a &#8220;process&#8221; I find fundamentally flawed and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I belong to a number of organizations which focus on varied causes, from preserving our wildlife and wilderness and stopping starvation, deprivation, and/or cruelty to preserving our Constitution and Bill of Rights.  I sign petitions, write my congressional representatives and senators, and generally participate in the socio-political process, a &#8220;process&#8221; I find fundamentally flawed and tedious, but, nevertheless, necessary until and unless a better system is implemented (something I also work toward).</p>
<p>More and more, I find that, instead of email campaigns and petitions, I&#8217;m asked to spend time, effort, and money to &#8220;call&#8221; my congressional reps and senators&#8211;state, local, and federal.  This is asking way too much, and the answer is &#8220;no.&#8221;  Don&#8217;t expect me to add more to my to-do list, and, if you persist in hounding me to do so, you&#8217;ll lose my support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/06/06/no-i-wont-dont-expect-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Characteristics of a Right Wing Social Conservative &#8211; the short list</title>
		<link>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/02/19/characteristics-of-a-right-wing-social-conservative-the-short-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/02/19/characteristics-of-a-right-wing-social-conservative-the-short-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dlkeur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics, culture, society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They love: * violent sports * war * cruelty * watching others suffer * hurting others * reaping rewards at the expense of others They hate: * fairness * equality * anyone not of their particular faith * anyone who has a different socio-political viewpoint * anyone who has a lifestyle different than their own [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They love:</p>
<p>* violent sports<br />
* war<br />
* cruelty<br />
* watching others suffer<br />
* hurting others<br />
* reaping rewards at the expense of others</p>
<p>They hate:</p>
<p>* fairness<br />
* equality<br />
* anyone not of their particular faith<br />
* anyone who has a different socio-political viewpoint<br />
* anyone who has a lifestyle different than their own<br />
* anyone not of their race<br />
* kindness<br />
* generosity<br />
* peace<br />
* tolerance<br />
* anyone to prosper except themselves and their select circle</p>
<p>This, of course, isn&#8217;t a comprehensive list.  Do feel free to contribute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/02/19/characteristics-of-a-right-wing-social-conservative-the-short-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs: Many Articles, One Inevitable Conclusion</title>
		<link>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/01/03/many-articles-one-inevitable-conclusion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/01/03/many-articles-one-inevitable-conclusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 14:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dlkeur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics, culture, society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the personal side]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over-population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solutions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are and have been a lot of articles about the state of jobs in the U.S. Reading them, I find only one or two that actually address the real problem: over-population. That&#8217;s because it&#8217;s a tabboo subject; it&#8217;s unpopular to suggest that people must stop having so many babies. When I was in high [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are and have been a lot of articles about the state of jobs in the U.S.  Reading them, I find only one or two that actually address the real problem: over-population.  That&#8217;s because it&#8217;s a tabboo subject; it&#8217;s unpopular to suggest that people must stop having so many babies.  When I was in high school, then college, though, it kept striking me that population growth along with technological innovation would, in time, prove to be disastrous for our nation and the world. And, unfortunately, that time has come.  I used to argue that in Economics class; I still argue that with colleagues, though, lately, their voices are fewer and weaker because, 1) their jobs have been outsourced overseas, and, 2) computers and automation have taken over their tasks. Even jobs requiring a high degree of mental acumen and skill are being phased out from a &#8220;permanent&#8221; position to that of a &#8220;permanent temporary&#8221;, subcontracted status. Mostly gone are the lucrative, lifetime jobs where you could look forward to retirement after, say, thirty years of satisfying, steady employment with the same firm, working your way up the company hierarchy.</p>
<p>DOING MORE FOR LESS<br />
Technological innovation and computer automation are, of course, wonderful. One person can do so much more today than they could even ten years ago&#8230;by themselves, without an army of help. So, pound for pound and dollar for dollar, they and the company they work for make more money, right? Maybe, depending on the circumstances and the business. Mostly, it depends on how the business is run and how much competition vies for the same market&#8230;because competition for income is more intense with the increasing number of desperate available bodies willing to do it for less.</p>
<p>REPLACING THOSE EXPENSIVE HUMAN WORKERS<br />
Of course, robotics allow companies to get rid of expensive workers who, being human, are, well, human. Emotions, illness, familial responsibilities, and the need for reasonably safe, comfortable working conditions all add a toll to hiring live bodies as opposed to high-tech mechanicals. Robots are expensive, though. Still, when measuring one robot&#8217;s productivity against that of a live worker, robots make a lot of sense.  It takes 4.2 human workers to do the same amount of work as one robot if those humans can and will work at the same speed and with the same efficiency as said robot.  And, of course, you need the tech to maintain and fix the robot&#8230;or a contract with the company who makes it.  Still, the robot is still cheaper, especially since a robot can be used as a depreciation expense.  So, considering all the variables, buying a robot (or several) is definitely much more appealing than employing human beings.  And robots don&#8217;t need health care or retirement benefits, a huge plus in savings.</p>
<p>BURGEONING POPULATION<br />
Then, of course, there&#8217;s the sheer volume of people who need or want work. That makes workers very cheap and becoming cheaper still as population increases.</p>
<p>SHORT TERM SOLUTION? I don&#8217;t think there is one that&#8217;s politically appealing to either of our political parties, nor one that is practical without closing the borders and isolationism, plus some stringent new commerce laws&#8230;such as: to sell in the U.S., you must create the product in a U.S.-based factory that employs U.S. citizens, else pay a huge tariff for the privilege of selling to Americans.</p>
<p>LONG TERM SOLUTION? Pretty easy to figure out: reduce the human population by reducing the number of babies born.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2011/01/03/many-articles-one-inevitable-conclusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s My Life, My Telephone, My Email.</title>
		<link>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2010/08/22/its-my-life-my-telephone-my-email/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2010/08/22/its-my-life-my-telephone-my-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 04:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dlkeur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics, culture, society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/?p=273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It always amazes me how absolutely stupid businesses and marketers are.  You&#8217;d think they&#8217;d get a clue&#8230;but they don&#8217;t.  Well, here it is spelled out: It&#8217;s MY telephone.  I pay for it.  You don&#8217;t.  That means that it&#8217;s MY tool, MY communication device, to use when I wish.  It is NOT your ticket to my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always amazes me how absolutely stupid businesses and marketers are.  You&#8217;d think they&#8217;d get a clue&#8230;but they don&#8217;t.  Well, here it is spelled out: It&#8217;s MY telephone.  I pay for it.  You don&#8217;t.  That means that it&#8217;s MY tool, MY communication device, to use when I wish.  It is NOT your ticket to my ear.  If and when YOU start paying the bill, maybe then you have a right to use it&#8230;but I won&#8217;t be listening.  Same with my email, and the same with my life.  Go suck something toxic.  Oh, and, just so you know, the more messages you leave, the more spam you send, the more junk mail and packages you leave in my real mailbox and at my front door, the more you receive bad marks and bad press, and, psst, everybody knows word of mouth advertising, bad or good, is the very best advertising money CAN&#8217;T buy. *snicker*  Ah&#8230;Facebook folks?  You might take a page from this for yourself.  Don&#8217;t think your solicitations go unnoticed.  They don&#8217;t.  They get you LOADS of bad press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2010/08/22/its-my-life-my-telephone-my-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abortion Versus The Save Every Fetus Crowd</title>
		<link>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2010/06/09/abortion-versus-the-save-every-fetus-crowd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2010/06/09/abortion-versus-the-save-every-fetus-crowd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dlkeur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics, culture, society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fetus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jesus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/?p=271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m certainly more in favor of pregnancy prevention than abortion, but I&#8217;m totally against having a woman carry a fetus to term who, A) doesn&#8217;t want it, and/or B) can&#8217;t afford it. I think abortion for those who desire it NEEDS to be an option in an enlightened society. We don&#8217;t need to go back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m certainly more in favor of pregnancy prevention than abortion, but I&#8217;m totally against having a woman carry a fetus to term who, A) doesn&#8217;t want it, and/or B) can&#8217;t afford it. I think abortion for those who desire it NEEDS to be an option in an enlightened society. We don&#8217;t need to go back to &#8220;back alley&#8221; abortions, something that killed my grandmother when her husband, my grandfather, threatened to leave her if she got pregnant again. Of course, she got pregnant again because good ol&#8217; granddad couldn&#8217;t keep it in his pants and blamed HER for getting pregnant because of his lust.</p>
<p>Anti-abortion folks hold their misguided sense of saving babies for JEEESUS or whatever god-head they claim as sacrosanct savior. Yet, they same folks decry payments to welfare moms.</p>
<p>Anti-abortion folks need to &#8220;put it back in their pants,&#8221; &#8220;it&#8221; being their religious-based insistence that we all, every last one of us, need to follow their sense of moral code and ethics. No we don&#8217;t. You&#8217;re extremists, fanatics, and completely irrational, proven by your dissonant positions which holds that, while abortion shouldn&#8217;t happen at all, regardless of circumstance, that supporting the resulting unwanted child is not your financial and social problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2010/06/09/abortion-versus-the-save-every-fetus-crowd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are American&#8217;s Angry?</title>
		<link>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2010/05/22/why-are-americans-angry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2010/05/22/why-are-americans-angry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 18:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dlkeur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics, culture, society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/?p=268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether you&#8217;re a right winger, a left-winger, a progressive, regressive, or even *gasp* an independent/centrist/middle-of-the-roader&#8211;heck, enven if you&#8217;re a fence-sitter&#8211;I bet, like me, you&#8217;re mad as hell at the state of our union. 1 ) Not enough good paying jobs of any sort to go around for people who want to work. 2 ) Too [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether you&#8217;re a right winger, a left-winger, a progressive, regressive, or even *gasp* an independent/centrist/middle-of-the-roader&#8211;heck, enven if you&#8217;re a fence-sitter&#8211;I bet, like me, you&#8217;re mad as hell at the state of our union.</p>
<p>1 ) Not enough good paying jobs of any sort to go around for people who want to work.</p>
<p>2 ) Too many illegal aliens, a lot of them bad apples, entering this country.</p>
<p>3 ) Too many illegal aliens willing to work for low wages in this country making it a boon to employers who want cheap labor.</p>
<p>4 ) Too many employers getting away with hiring illegal aliens, abusing them, and paying them wages a dog couldn&#8217;t eat on.</p>
<p>5 ) Too many Wall Streeters making money by trading off American livelihoods.</p>
<p>6 ) Too many media moguls slanting everything to benefit their bottom line instead of doing their jobs of reporting unslanted news.</p>
<p>7 ) Too many stupid laws that concern things best left up to the individual.</p>
<p>8 ) Too many good laws being ignored and violated because it pays somebody&#8217;s bottom line.</p>
<p>9 ) Criminals walking around free with open access to guns and explosives while law-abiding citizens are denied the right to carry weapons.</p>
<p>10 ) Too much focus by elected officials on getting re-elected instead of doing their jobs.</p>
<p>Add your own below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2010/05/22/why-are-americans-angry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Love VS Lust Discernment Problems?</title>
		<link>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2010/05/20/love-vs-lust-discernment-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2010/05/20/love-vs-lust-discernment-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 01:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dlkeur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics, culture, society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just saw this Facebook ad: &#8220;A story chronicling the college years of a young woman as she struggles to distinguish love from lust.&#8221; I am just laughing my **** off. So young women today don&#8217;t know the difference between love and lust? Really? You can&#8217;t tell when it&#8217;s your pheromones kicking that&#8217;s getting you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw this Facebook ad: &#8220;A story chronicling the college years of a young woman as she struggles to distinguish love from lust.&#8221; I am just laughing my **** off. So young women today don&#8217;t know the difference between love and lust? Really? You can&#8217;t tell when it&#8217;s your pheromones kicking that&#8217;s getting you &#8220;hot&#8221; versus when it&#8217;s your heart and mind that truly admires and desires to be with someone forever? That&#8217;s really sad. But, then, I suppose that&#8217;s been true of a lot of girls and women who put sex as high on their list of priorities versus friendship. Here&#8217;s a hint: marry your best friend&#8230;after living together for a few years, of course, to make sure the relationship really is a &#8220;forever&#8221; thing. And don&#8217;t have kids until that marriage has made it without them for a solid five years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dlkeur.com/dlkeur-blog/2010/05/20/love-vs-lust-discernment-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

